Բանբեր Երևանի համալսարանի - Միջազգային հարաբերություններ, Քաղաքագիտություն

Թուրքիայի կողմից հայոց անկախ պետության ճանաչման շարժառիթները և նպատակները

Գեղամ Պետրոսյան — 2018-11-06

The article analyzes the Armenian-Turkish diplomatic negotiations when the Armenian delegation is looking for ways to maintain peace and further diplomatic negotiations. In this regard, the article focuses on the fact that on June 4, 1918, under pressure from Ottoman Turkey, Alexander Khatisyan signed a document and made a certain commitment. Thus, the government of the Republic of Armenia was obliged not to have diplomatic relations with countries in the war with the Ottoman Empire throughout the war. The article concludes that the acceptance and recognition of the Armenian independent state was not a manifestation of Ottoman Turkey’s “mercy” to the Armenians, but only because of its many and varied motives and long-term goals.

Ինչո՞ւ Ադրբեջանական Հանրապետության ցեղասպանական վարքը չի արտացոլված նրա քաղաքական նկարագրում

Ալեքսանդր Մանասյան — 2018-11-06

Both in Turkey and Azerbaijan, there is a similar phenomenon: neither the transition from one political-economic system to another, nor the change of government turned these states away from the course of the Armenian Genocide. The fact suggests that the reasons for the genocidal policy must be searched
not only “in the depths” of the state (especially imperially oriented) as an institution, but also in the peculiarities of the historically formed political culture of the nation. It also turns out that in geopolitically tense regions (Western Asia and Transcaucasia were and remain such regions), the responsibility for the commission of genocide is not only the state that carried out the crime, but the great powers directly involved in the “affairs of the region”. Their complicity manifests itself either in the form of inaction, then false neutrality, or indirect (and even direct) participation.

ՀՀ-ՆԱՏՕ գործակցության դերն ու նշանակությունը ՀՀ ռազմաքաղաքական անվտանգության ապահովման համատեքստում

Ալեն Ղևոնդյան — 2018-11-06

The article presents the different aspects of the historical, progressive and political partnership between the Republic of Armenia and NATO. The article considers that Turkish and Russian factors have a direct impact on Armenia-NATO relations. The article analyses the approaches of NATO towards the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement process, particularly it refers to the wording of the declarations. The article explores all the aspects of Armenia-NATO relations and the implementation of NATO-Armenia Individual Partnership Action Plans.

«Ֆուտբոլային դիվանագիտության» արձագանքները թուրքական մամուլում

Դավիթ Սաֆարյան — 2018-11-06

The political and public opinion of Turkey reacted sensitively to the steps taken by the leadership of the ruling Justice and Development Party in Turkey to promote Football Diplomacy. On the one hand in the course of Football Diplomacy (2008-2011) the Turkish press had been writing about Armenia and the issue of normalizing relations with it most of all, but on the other hand, it was obvious that the Turkish socio-political opinion was not ready to normalize relations with Armenia without any pre-conditions, remaining hostage to the political moods dominating in Azerbaijan. It is worth noting that even though there were individual supporters of normalizing relations with Armenia in Turkey of the period in question or later on, their voice was much weaker than the voice of the supporters of linking the normalization process with the Nagorno-Karabakh settlement and its staging in front of Armenia as a precondition.

Երկխոսության հիմնախնդիրն անտիկ դարաշրջանի քաղաքական մտքի համատեքստում

Խաչիկ Գալստյան — 2018-11-06

Within the framework of the article, the author considers the evolution of dialogue development as a method of conducting a conversation and establishing communication in the context of the political thought of antiquity. In particular, the author concludes, that the dialogue occupied a central place in the
ancient Greek worldview, being an integral part of the ancient spiritual culture. And the ancient Greek social and political thought, according to the author, developed through the active use of dialogical technologies as the most effective and civilized mechanism for resolving disputes and contradictions, combining interests, and establishing cooperation between various subjects of communication interaction.

Հայաստանի քաղաքական համակարգի կայունությունը. ազդեցության գործոններն ու սպառնալիքները

Արուսյակ Ալեքսանյան — 2018-11-06

The issue of political stability is one of the most relevant topics of modern political science. Destabilization is accompanied by an increase in the level of civil disobedience and tension in society, as well as by the decrease in the effectiveness of conflict resolution and of the management of social processes. The article analyzes factors and threats to the political stability of Armenia. The author highlights two main factors of influence: 1) external – the Karabakh conflict and
militarization of the region and 2) internal – the lack of legitimacy, operationalizing the latter into the level of civil disobedience. For a deeper analysis, the Stability index of the political system of Armenia is calculated in a span of 2000-2017 years. Through the regression analysis, the factors, influencing the political stability of Armenia most of all, are also revealed.

Մասնակցության ինստիտուցիոնալացման հիմնախնդիրները քաղաքացիական հասարակության մեջ (ՀՀ օրինակով)

Առնակ Սարգսյան — 2018-11-06

The article examines the role of civil society in achieving social cohesion, manifestations of engagement, promoting transparency and accountability in the effective governance of governmental institutions. The formation and further development of civil society have been studied as a guarantee of the stability of society, which is conditioned with the cooperation and coordinated activities of the public-state sector by the dialogue of the state and civil society entities.